The thing is, I much prefer the warm display on the M262. I got the m262 because it has everything i need and nothing i do not need. A week or so later I was on a shoot for work. The sensor is not the same, by the way. Hey all, I've owned an M6 for several years and in the next few months will be unloading a few of my higher-end film cameras to (downsize and) purchase a digital Leica to compliment my M6. I think, at least, Ive not tried one either . This is an inspiring and generous website. Of course it didnt. The M240 shot..more DR it seems. The M240 is a camera where perhaps 50% of the image is created in camera, 50% in computer. Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience-, Leica M6 Classic & Leica M6 TTL A Review of Both Variants, Leica M8 (Finally) Falling in love with this aging digital By Taffy Ledesma, Leica IIf Red Dial: Nostalgia, or Tool for Serious Storytelling? Intro Sample Images Lenses Specs Performance. It was the third major iteration of colour digital Leica M rangefinder, and the first to use a CMOS type sensor. Ultimately, if youre looking for all the bells and whistles, you certainly wont find them on this camera. TheLeica M (Typ 262) has a pared-down feature set, an extra quiet shutter unit and a lower price than theM Typ 240. In short, I generally find myself not needing to tweak the colours at all from the M262, which is something I quite appreciate. Upload or insert images from URL. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Survey: Third-party Lenses for Leica M-Mount , Umfrage: Dritthersteller Objektive fr Leica M-Mount . Here are photos from my first shoot with it: https://matthewtrader.com/leica-m262-review-after-photographing-my-nieces-5th-birthday-party. Loomis77December 27, 2020 in Leica M (Type 240 / 262). 35mmc is a blog authored, edited and published by Hamish Gill featuring daily articles submitted by readers. The top plate of the M262 feels slightly more hollow than the M240 not it a way that you can feel it, but you can sort of hear it if you tap it, and even sometimes when the strap rattles on it. Here are my thoughts on the M240 alongside my second hand and limited knowledge of the M10. Live-view brings something extra to a type of camera I had previously (possibly quite stubbornly) felt couldnt be improved. Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. I was wondering if you ever ended up upgrading to the M10? From what I gather, skin tones have better rendering with the M10. Its still inaccurate, but at least the photos look pleasant enough. The Leica M262 (and M240 or any other current M as of July of 2016) seems more like a bridge between the past and what could be the future of Leica. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. I've always wanted a Leica and was thinking of picking up a used M262 or M240 to replace my Fuji. Im still getting used to it, but for me a 2 issues, weight with a big 50mm lens and editing the files you really bring out the image quality as it seems a bit flat to me. The view taken by some Leica users when the M240 was released was that features like live-view and video had no place on a Leica. A microphone port allows connecting external high-end or specialized microphones. I am aware many own the Monochrom and love it to death. Upload or insert images from URL. https://www.overgaard.dk/Leica-M-Type-240-aka-Leica-M10-digital-rangefinder-camera-page-44-Focusing-the-Leica-M-with-Manual-Focus-EVF2-Visoflex-Electronic-Viewfinder.html. It does this by digitally enhancing the image output. Image: Leica. I upgrade cameras, selling them and adding a little bit of funds from what disposable income I do have, also relying on credit a bit too much. Ive turned off the automatic image review and hardly ever needto go through the menu - and for the few times that I do so I appreciate the very simple menu structure so its easy to find what Im after. As cboy pointed out above, that may limit lens choice. Using it in this factory, a space where I needed to be aware of the timing of things that were happening around me, it just clicked for me. Forget is a strong word. Leica claims it uses different technology, whatever that means. Quality over quantity. I did eventually get the 1.25 viewfinder magnifier to go with it. When it comes to making video, things are different! Sometimes, colours from M262 can be a bit more saturated than from M240, but as I use them only in recording DNG, post work can do what I want. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. I have had good luck with Sonys latest fast SD cards, improving this condition quite well. The fact that Ive somehow managed to rationalise my way out of that opinion doesnt change how good the M262 really is, and indeed how well suited to me I once felt it to be. A few more differences - Leica M10 vs Leica M240. The camera is nearly forgotten in the Leica world. In fact, I caught myself using it a number of times without thinking. Leica M262 M-P M10 M262 Leica M-E . The model omits the Typ 240's live view and video capabilities, and has a much simpler menu structure and one-button access to . After the M11 released though, used prices of the M10 dropped and I decided to get one. Got a spare lottery ticket? More humble pie for me! Its been that camera that I know is there and just crack out when it feels right. They arent rangefinder coupled past 1m, but nonetheless they do focus that close. Controls feel well balanced and satisfyingly precise. Compared Usage Recommendations More. Source: DxOMark. Hello. So I am very glad I got the 240 version. The colour differences between the two are due to slightly different colour handling in the camera and can be cancelled out completely by the camera profiles in LR. It was the same shape as the M262 I was used to, maybe a touch heavier, but not really noticeably in the hand. It has a better screen, live-view, no video and even has a ISO dial (like you might find on a Fuji). The Leica M9/ M8 B&W JPEGs can be created 95-99% in camera and I would say my black and white film images are 88% in camera/film developing, 2% scanning, 10% in computer to remove dust and do any basic darkroom style adjustments. A m262 is limited to the lens choice as it rangefinder view only. I did the same thing Hamish, never having handled the M10. Since most reviews are quite large in content thanks to extensive coverage, comparisons to other cameras and large sample images, they span across multiple pages for easier reading experience. The ideas with Leica is identities. My biggest problem with the digital M bodies is I cant use my Summicron DR on them (although, havent tested it on an M10 yet). if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-large-mobile-banner-1','ezslot_17',188,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-large-mobile-banner-1-0'); Overall, these changes made the move from the M9 to M262 feel greater than the sum of their parts. When the Leica M262 was released, Leica proudly told the world that the menu had been reduced to two screens worth of features. It leaves me with no desire whatsoever to upgrade at all and will be my sole digital camera for hopefully many years to come. I use it for mostly personal/travel type shooting, with the occasional casual paid shoot. It serves specific duty now, monochrome and infrared imaging only. I just bought a M262.Its my 3rd Leica M (after a M6 and a M240) and each time I come back to a M, its a delight. Our camera evaluations and conclusions are based . As I don't need money selling them "cheap", I'm happy to keep them all for what they are, using each one equally. All of a sudden, the M10 held a lot of appeal. 3200-10,000 (I find this to be really handy for indoor family photos, which is essentially the only time I need high ISOs) the larger and brighter viewfinder the size (yes, one can really feel a difference) overall operational responsiveness to a much lesser degree: fewer buttons on the back of the camera, smaller red dot, more matte black finish. Learn how your comment data is processed. The even newer M-P Typ 240 purchase just opens up addtional opportunities of using a digital M as a multi-purpose tool. Verified purchase: Yes | Condition . Both were taken at 3200 ISO to try and exaggerate any image quality issues. The 262 probably has a more stable power management, resulting in less banding and thus better high ISO performance. This isnt me highlighting something bad though, it makes no difference to anything really. I upgraded from the M9 on single basis that I wanted a camera with a better screen. On the M240 its easy to change ISO by simply pressing the dedicated ISO button and turning the thumb adjustment wheel.The EVF. Good thing, I don't need to upgrade further, as those are plenty enough for many years to come. So, yeah, as I said, video is just not something I want to do with a Leica M camera! Same settings, same ISO of 320, etc. Very interesting. In the setup menu, the most used setting is white balance. Which is the better buy? Didnt have the budget to stretch to a Summilux/Summicron/ Summarit. If not, get the 262. Ill have to dig out an online manual , I got an 262 you have to press SET after choosing- only with 3 button possiblewith latest software (2021). Use your experience to help others in the community make a decision. Another M10 fetish is better performance at high ISO. The sensor is not the same, by the way. With a standard mini jack socket, you can use the device with most headphones. Can you let me know where you heard that the sensor uses different technology? Some of our partners may process your data as a part of their legitimate business interest without asking for consent. We case our eye over the options costing more than $2500 but less than $4000, to find the best all-rounder. Posted December 28, 2020 (edited) A m262 is limited to the lens choice as it rangefinder view only. has a removable battery. The M240 feels, well, fuller. I remember when live-view first started appearing on interchangeable lens digital cameras. BECOME A MEMBER to get access to perks:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCMbqwh98qO5wWowtQjIK8ig/joinEXCLUSIVE PRESETS FOR IMAGES CAPTURED WITH LEICA CAMERAS:. I just picked up a Leica M-P Typ 240 to compliment my new M9-P I bought a couple weeks ago. They take on a garish orange tint that is hard to process in LR. Pasted as rich text. You can post now and register later. As such, it felt like itd be the perfect camera for me. Thank you for it. Raw files are so named because they are not yet processed and therefore are not ready to be printed or edited with a bitmap graphics editor. I think I am veering towards the M262 with the Voigtlander Ultron35mm. Great pictures and very interesting. If zinc is your preference the M6 is your baby. M240 v. M246 v. M262 v. Monochrom 246. The more focus points the more flexibility in picking which part of the scene to focus on. . Seems I do once again. Ive tried all of the digital M types and my heartfelt favorites are the M8 and M9-P (equally), then the Typ 262 in that order. True Leica again (after the M240), pure and sololy focused on the Photography essentials. It is certainly one of the most economical full frame digital Leica M cameras out there, however, still a very expensive camera, even used. Paste as plain text instead, In fact, for this very reason the Leica M262 has actually presented me with the least inspiration so far. Damn digital cameras I can control film camera GAS quite well these days, but these digital buggers still get me! Most of the digital M bodies are going to offer a satisfactory experience for the average first time Leica user. The new Leica M is the most innovative and versatile M-Camera that the modern M-System has ever created. All features aside, my lust was triggered by the drastic reduction in size. I dont mind adjusting contrast, thats just part of the process of me. This really piqued my interest. Your link has been automatically embedded. I know youre right, I often talk about the bullshit involved in the upgrade path but it has an iso dial! It only having felt right once in 6 months felt wrong. In case you're confused, the M240 was the camera that followed the Leica M9. This happens with the M240 from time to time. Though I prefer using Rolleiflex and an old M4 for my creative projects. Image Quality. Source: DxOMark. Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. It seemed it was not much larger than an M7; that, alone, was enough to make me decide I would own one someday. With 100% coverage, you can compose the image correctly when you capture the photo. Display as a link instead, ), and Im now looking to part with the Leica M240 and put the money back into my business (where I borrowed it from). A raw image file contains minimally processed data from the image sensor. Great article as always! One of the advantages of live-view is the same as one of the advantages of rangefinder cameras they both allow you to observe the world outside of the frame. The maximum resolution available for videos shot with the main camera. M262 can be more pleasing in use as lighter with longer lasting battery and a bit quieter than M240. In one of his editorial pieces in Amateur Photographer he applauds this philosophy. I know thats not a crime, I also know it has nothing to do with how much skill I have as a photographer. Leica M262 - "A Leica M240 in a Leica M9 body" The Leica M 262 that Leica Camera AG surprisingly introduced November 2015 is basically a Leica M 240 in a Leica M9 body. After weeks with a production Fujifilm X-T5, Chris and Jordan have some final thoughts. There are two things to be separated here. As the cameras are meant to have identical sensors, do we think this is just new owner's biased impressions (nothing wrong with that btw) is could there be something in this? I appreciate your thoughts on the 262 v the 240 as I am thinking about setting an MD body. That, in my opinion, is the Leica M 240's motto. Its. You cannot paste images directly. To each his own. Quick charge with automatic constant current control prevents battery from overcharging, short circuit, and electronic shock The better a device's color depth the more color nuances it can distinguish. So its not a financial burden to have it around, and selling it wont yield me that much cash, and I have no desire to sell it anyways since its my favorite M of all time that still serves some legitimate purpose. Jordan's twin brother Gordon is back to review the cinema-focused Canon EOS R5 C! Any chance youre planning to do a write up on that Nokton 50mm f/1.2? I'm looking into both as well and leaning towards the 262 because I have no use for video with this purchase and I love the shutter. The Leica M [typ 262], or M262 for short offers whats best described as a stripped-back user interface. I then had a feeling that Im sure a lot of people who have too many cameras have once in a while You might know it yourself? Why torture yourself? Mostly because I wanted to shoot below 0.7m and Id have to use Live View for that. I could sell the M262, and my beloved Monochrom (and maybe a couple of lenses), thus satisfying the GAS problem and simultaneously slimming down my cameras without actually having to spend any more money or as my mate James would say, I could make this a revenue-neutral purchase. And sometimes they could come in handy. November 7, 2013 December 8, 2013 Peter . In reality, Ive been saving for this m10 for a long time. The M262 was the stripped-back camera that came after the M240 and before the M10 and as regular readers of this website will know, I do like a stripped-back camera.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[580,400],'35mmc_com-medrectangle-3','ezslot_10',180,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-medrectangle-3-0'); Leica must have listened to some of their users who felt that they didnt need a lot of the features that the Leica M240 offered them, and created a camera that felt a little more like a natural progression from the M9. Lastly, its kind of neat that these two are sort of a match- but different enough to stand out on my desk when I go to grab one for a shoot. But even then, its not close to other modern cameras. My justification for upgrading from the M9 to the Leica M262 was almost more ridiculous than the justifications Im hanging my decisions off moving from M262 to M10. Leica has used the button space on the rear of the camera that is used for live view in the Typ 240 to . Notify me of follow-up comments by email. Theres been a couple of times when Ive picked the camera up one after using it in lower light and ended up shooting a whole loads of frames at a high ISO before twigging that the chosen shutter speed seems too high. At0.68 magnification itll be hard to push to 75mm without a magnifier eyepiece x1.25 or x1.4. . I have preview turned off too and use it like I do my M6. !if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-box-4','ezslot_13',182,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-box-4-0'); One way or another, in the time Ive been using the camera, Ive not got used to this little issue, though I have at least learned to live with it. The resulting image will have less quality than when staying within the native ISO range, but it can be useful in certain situations. The Leica M10-R rangefinder camera has a newly developed 40 megapixel sensor that represents a big increase from the 24 megapixels of the previous M10 model. Which despite it feeling like something that would really suit me as someone who prefers to operate without the need for any sort of menu driven interface on their cameras was still a fairly small feature for quite a lot more cash!if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-medrectangle-3','ezslot_10',180,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-medrectangle-3-0'); As such I bought an M262 and fairly happily got on with shooting it for the best part of a year. For the M240, forget it. Last thursday I thought for a few moments about selling my complete gear because of the new Q2, but then I thought about my beloved Summicron 90 from 1973 and my Tele Elmar 135 from 1963 and my Summilux 50 from 2017 and then I said to me: No!, I cannot sell them, I am not a fan of 28 mm.The only tiny shortcoming is for me the limitation of the maximum shutter speed (60 sec) and sometimes I miss an autofocus. You can get two M-Ps (old and new) for the same price as one M10. I had recently bought a Nikon 50mm f/2 LTM lens and had mounted it on the M240. I too prefer the more stripped back feature set of the M9, M240, and M10. In fact, I could almost go as far to say that even this stripped back Leica has too many buttons and options for my needs! If you intend to use lenses wider than 28mm or longer than 135mm Liveview and EVF are very useful, also macro photography is much easier (essential with the new 90mm macro lens and macro adapter) or if you need video. These were features I wanted to explore whilst I had this camera though I really had very low expectations that they would do much for me. By Exphotog, A Love Affair With The Leica M-D 262 by Ong Sien Hong - 35mmc, Initial experiments with a Leica M10-P and a Nikon 35mm 2.8 PC Shift Lens - 35mmc, (Mis)adventures with a Minolta Himatic 7s - By Matt Evans, 5 Frames with the new Voigtlander Color-Skopar Vintage Line 21mm f/3.5 By John Scott, Camera, Lens, Film and Peripheral Kit Reviews. I use the 1.4 magnifier with my old 90mm tele-elmarit and an external viewfinder with my voigtlander 21mm f1.4 both work just fine for me. Fast continuous shooting is useful for catching action shots. They also give the image sensor a better probability in identifying the right area of the scene to focus on in more automatic modes. You'd be wise to buy the best/latest digital body you can afford and leave a healthy budget for the best/most lenses possible. The settings I use (format and manual or auto lens designation) pop up first on the main menu and with 2 clicks both actions are completed. Actually, a large part of this is because they dont often inspire me to write about them whilst I own them, yet I hate to see them go without doing them the justice of sharing a few thoughts.var cid='8222364248';var pid='ca-pub-7054871687658000';var slotId='div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-box-3-0';var ffid=1;var alS=1002%1000;var container=document.getElementById(slotId);container.style.width='100%';var ins=document.createElement('ins');ins.id=slotId+'-asloaded';ins.className='adsbygoogle ezasloaded';ins.dataset.adClient=pid;ins.dataset.adChannel=cid;if(ffid==2){ins.dataset.fullWidthResponsive='true';} A series of photographs taken from the same position over a long period is joined together to create a short video. That said, the real joy is in how little even the two screens of options in the main menu need to be used. Mostly because of the need for a screen that I allude to. This means the image will be stabilised regardless of what lens is being used. The consent submitted will only be used for data processing originating from this website. I dont have and 6-bit coded lenses, or really bother with the coding, so just tend to set the minimum speed to 1/60th. The Leica M (Typ 262) is a digital rangefinder camera announced by Leica Camera on November 19, 2015. Privacy policy. That said, Ive sometimes found that shooting in high contrast situations the exposure prefers to underexpose slightly, yet have always found the shadows to have plenty enough detail in them when pulled out in post. Whilst I fully get that it is down to personal preference, I just thought I would ask the question: M240 (or its E and P variants) or M262? great output, but cant get a shot off faster than with the M8. Image quality will be essentially the same. For example, I have seen an as new M240 from a Leica Store for 2,495 and a Voigtlander Ultron 50mm for c.700. You shouldnt be so hard on yourself, Pera. More battery power can be an indication of longer battery life. To me this seems like a hassle. Agreed that the 262 is like some forgotten model.Also agreed on the fact that once the camera is set-up, theres no need for the buttons and menus. I think everyone gave great suggestions, I went with a new 262, love the shutter and simplicity compared to the 240. Equally, if I dont find anything particularly bad to say, thats got to be a good thing too, but it doesnt really help in the process of finding things to say. An example of data being processed may be a unique identifier stored in a cookie. With regards to minimizing my digital camera gear, my thinking was simple. The build quality of the M 262 is impeccable. dslr . Material choices as well as the overall fit and finish are second to none. The use of a CMOS sensor allowed Leica to include two key features that the previous M9 didnt have. Very nice work. Of all the mentioned digital rangefinders, I enjoyed the [], [] is a definite yes! And so I had to do a paradoxical thing. I didnt have the energy to get into the subtleties of all that here though, LV is useful even if the screen does not move. All other things aside, they, Leica M cameras, are unique. One review even suggested that the M10 should be called the M11, with the M240 rightfully being the M10. Thankfully with the M10 they've returned to the old system. Its back to the basics. Then I bought an early mirrorless camera possibly a Panasonic or Sony, I cant remember which came first and I had to eat a load of humble pie. I wont go into too much more detail now, but for saying that unlike the M240 and M262 that Ive otherwise used since the M9, the Leica M10-P really feels like it has []. I was once very happy with my M9. Clear editor. I love the M240, didn't feel to switch to the M10. Fast continuous shooting, reliable autofocus and great battery life are just three of the most important factors. As I mentioned in my recent post about the M240, the stripped-back interface was exactly reason I went for the M262 instead of the M240 when I was looking to replace my M9. The LEICA M typ 240 is the world's second full-frame mirrorless camera. In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for shooting sports and action, and recommended the best. It was that feeling that having less kit would do me good This became the excuse I needed to change up to the M10. You mirror my sentiments about the camera to a t! By As an M10 owner I should say that yes, this camera is definitely a less is more sort of gadget. The type of viewfinder that the camera has. Basically, Im sold on live-view these days but, despite this fact, I didnt think it would appeal to me on a Leica. I have both and haven't noticed any difference but I haven't done a side by side comparison. Yes!! Functionalism be damned. With a higher light sensitivity (ISO level), the sensor absorbs more light. Display as a link instead, I have a Fuji X100f and stripped down the OVF/EVF data and shoot in manual with manual focus only to give it a M2 feel. JPG Settings can be on the user assignable first screen and from that quickly turn on/off Monochrome. This was a heretical change from earlier Leicas. Even though this image set was only intentionally overexposed by a single stop in direct sunlight, the highlights from the image samples taken by the Leica M246 and the Leica M Monochrom were blown and unrecoverable in post processing. I'm not sure if it's ok to show a snapshot of the LFI article. With the wrong card, the wait before the shutter is again available is bad. This can be used to capture moving objects using a fast shutter speed, or to take images in low light without using a flash. It might be a step backwards in volume of features, but it was a step in the right direction in terms what I think a Leica camera should stand for. What's the best camera for shooting sports and action? In fact, I likely wouldnt be selling it at all if it werent for the fact that I recently and quite inadvertently gave myself a big chunk of M10 gear acquisition syndrome! It is the successor to the world's first full-frame mirrorless camera, the LEICA M9 of 2009.. I shot film forever and my M2 was my first range finder. The M240 is a great camera that produces gorgeous images but you are undoubtedly going to love the M10.